Monthly Archives: May 2025

From Kepler to Ptolemy 16

Prev TOC Next

Kepler

Kepler wrote five major astronomical works. Chronologically: Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Astronomy, History

Set Theory Jottings 9. Cantor Normal Form

Prev TOC Next

Suppose β>1, and let ζ>0 be arbitrary. Then ζ has a unique representation in so-called Cantor normal form: Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Set Theory

Set Theory Jottings 8. Ordinal Arithmetic

Prev TOC Next

Usually one defines the ordinal operations via transfinite induction:

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Set Theory

From Kepler to Ptolemy 15

Prev TOC Next

The Planetary Hypotheses

In the Planetary Hypotheses, Ptolemy lays out his cosmology: that is, the structure and arrangement of the universe. This work answers the question, did Ptolemy believe in the physical truth of the Almagest’s celestial geometry?—with an unambiguous Yes. Contrary to an opinion often expressed by earlier historians, he did not regard it just as a calculational scheme for predicting planetary positions.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Astronomy, History

Set Theory Jottings 7. The (Cantor-Dedekind-Schröder)-Bernstein Theorem

Prev TOC Next

The trichotomy of cardinals says that for any 𝔪 and 𝔫, exactly one of these holds: 𝔪<𝔫, 𝔪=𝔫, or 𝔪>𝔫. It’s equivalent to the conjunction of these two propositions, for any two cardinals 𝔪 and 𝔫:

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Set Theory

From Kepler to Ptolemy 14

Prev TOC Next

Cycle Counts

You may have heard that Ptolemaic systems grew to have 80 spheres or cycles, while the Copernican system had only 34. This is a myth.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Astronomy, History

Set Theory Jottings 6. Zorn’s Lemma

Prev TOC Next

Zermelo’s 1904 proof of the well-ordering theorem got a lot of blowback, as we’ve seen. On the other hand, the very next year Hamel used it to prove the existence of a so-called Hamel basis. In 1910, Steinitz made numerous applications in the theory of fields. He wrote:

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Set Theory